Why continue such things?

Continuance is a prospect to calculate somewhat accurately as it requires a stamina and an energy that shouldn’t alter, should not be remiss or run down. The prophet (in this instance prophet and not profit, but they do sound alike) of this that in any positive archive of great works, is where it can be found to state that “During a great work one keeps a standard with the power of the mind and not the body, by which the mentality speaks saying, that to be constant one must start how one means to finish”.

What to do with that as there are no alternatives to continue with, well, if one wants quality output, that is. Continuance and persistence are cousins, although in the first order of things persistence is always better employed when the run weakens than before, as it would be like burning the candle in daylight. Even before one’s reserve of something persistent is employed, it has signs that something in the inspired thing of it; the idea, the work itself, a deficit in the knowledge or level of it, a growing willingness to give it a rest and much more.

So what is needed is the added special fuel system that is only provided when the going is so tough, the world’s end is nearing because of it. That being of course the second and then third wind, tucked away for a now nearer death day, a body and mind instinct to save itself from the person in control. This says: who can be trusted then? Did the question mean us, you know, the already flogged and dying from sweat and perspiration friendlies who always come out at first asking. Well it’s all down to the governor, you know, the one who works it all out and then tries to live it as they are and without any formal training or learning time about it.

The rules; the first are right ones that shape our mentality and development e.g. higher rather than lower, and the second are right ones that allow you to pay the price for reaping what you sow e.g. “There is no amount of good that you can do if you don’t mind who gets the credit for it”. This so far means bearing in mind that they relate to the how, what, when and why of the higher life event. Knowledge is required for learning but learning isn’t just knowledge. 

The expectation for the normal is that knowledge is able to answer the paradox of learning itself but it can’t, it isn’t able to, simply because there are other features to consider e.g. experience which very often is at the refined end of the learning bar. Learning itself requires many components to happen that justify the learning, unless it is accompanied by the source of that learning. As one develops and moves on into an even greater work or works of life, a different language of actual event and life is spoken and the learning required requires another octave, dynamic, perspective to be learnt, this is e.g. one of the rules of Visitations or Appearances. 

Continued in Virsel. Find out more >>>>